Forloh Deep Cover camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Forloh

Deep Cover
This pattern stands out most for balanced, with a mid-scale lean; typical spatial distribution; and middle-range overall brightness, high tonal separation.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Pattern Scale

Balanced, with a mid-scale lean
Very high mid-scale structure and low fine-scale structure compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Spatial Distribution

Typical spatial distribution
Very low top bottom and very low rotational 180 compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Light & Dark Structure

Middle-range overall brightness, high tonal separation
High tonal separation compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: olive
Secondary: black
Warm 90.2%
Cool 9.8%
Neutral 17.6%
Light & Dark
Dark 47.7%
Mid 42%
Light 10.2%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 19.5%
Mid 42.3%
Large 38.2%
Dominant scale: balanced

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Olive / Black, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Olive / Black. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Middle-range overall brightness, high tonal separation

47.7% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its dark, mid, and light tonal groups are more distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.

What you may notice:
The pattern does not sit near either brightness extreme of the reference set.

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure

Edge density is typical, average detected edge strength is high, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Detected boundaries tend to remain visually pronounced where they occur.

Texture Character

Variable texture distribution

Fine texture density is low, roughness is typical, and texture uniformity is low compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture activity changes noticeably from one part of the pattern to another.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is low, while average retained-region elongation is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The visible structure is concentrated into fewer effective regions than in many reference patterns.

Pattern Scale

Balanced, with a mid-scale lean

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as balanced. Fine-scale energy is low, mid-scale energy is very high, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
No single scale band dominates strongly enough to define the pattern by itself.

Spatial Distribution

Typical spatial distribution

Spatial information balance is typical, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are typical, very low, and very low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The spread of visual activity is broadly typical of the reference set.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with middle-brightness overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing subdued olive vegetation. Its stronger light-and-dark separation should fit backgrounds with broken tonal variation. Its balanced scale with a mid-scale lean favors scenes containing a mixture of detail sizes with substantial medium-sized structure. Its variable texture also aligns with terrain where surface detail changes noticeably across the scene.

Where It May Struggle

Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to flat or low-contrast backgrounds.

Breakup Character

Detected boundaries tend to be strong and hard.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.