Bob Fratzke Winona camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Bob Fratzke

Winona
This pattern stands out most for darker than most patterns, high tonal separation; fewer edges, but strong with a high hard-edge share; and typical overall shape structure.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Light & Dark Structure

Darker than most patterns, high tonal separation
Very low overall brightness and high dark-area share compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Edge Character

Fewer edges, but strong with a high hard-edge share
Very low edge density and very high edge strength compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure
Very high shape elongation compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: gray
Secondary: brown
Warm 98.5%
Cool 1.5%
Neutral 21.1%
Light & Dark
Dark 58.2%
Mid 40.7%
Light 1.1%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 15.6%
Mid 39.8%
Large 44.6%
Dominant scale: balanced

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Gray / Brown, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Gray / Brown. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Darker than most patterns, high tonal separation

58.2% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its dark, mid, and light tonal groups are more distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.

What you may notice:
The pattern reads dark at a glance.

Edge Character

Fewer edges, but strong with a high hard-edge share

Edge density is very low, average detected edge strength is very high, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is very high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Detected boundaries tend to remain visually pronounced where they occur.

Texture Character

Variable texture distribution

Fine texture density is low, roughness is low, and texture uniformity is low compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture activity changes noticeably from one part of the pattern to another.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is typical, while average retained-region elongation is very high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The effective division of visible regions is broadly typical.

Pattern Scale

Balanced, with a mid-scale lean

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as balanced. Fine-scale energy is very low, mid-scale energy is high, and large-scale energy is high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
No single scale band dominates strongly enough to define the pattern by itself.

Spatial Distribution

Typical spatial distribution

Spatial information balance is typical, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are typical, typical, and typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The spread of visual activity is broadly typical of the reference set.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with darker or more shadowed overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing brown bark, soil, dead leaves, or dormant vegetation and gray rock, bark, dead wood, or neutral material. Its stronger light-and-dark separation should fit backgrounds with broken tonal variation. Its balanced scale with a mid-scale lean favors scenes containing a mixture of detail sizes with substantial medium-sized structure. Its variable texture also aligns with terrain where surface detail changes noticeably across the scene.

Where It May Struggle

Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to very bright or pale backgrounds and flat or low-contrast backgrounds.

Breakup Character

The pattern contains relatively few detected edges, but those edges tend to be strong and hard. Its visible forms tend to be more elongated.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.