Alaska Blindtech Invisible II camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Alaska

Blindtech Invisible II
This pattern stands out most for rougher texture character; typical spatial distribution; and olive / Black, high saturation, strongly warm.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Texture Character

Rougher texture character
Very high fine-texture density and high texture roughness compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Spatial Distribution

Typical spatial distribution
Very low left right and low top bottom compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Color Character

Olive / Black, high saturation, strongly warm
High saturation compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: olive
Secondary: black
Warm 87.3%
Cool 12.7%
Neutral 4.1%
Light & Dark
Dark 51.8%
Mid 41.9%
Light 6.3%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 38.1%
Mid 26.1%
Large 35.8%
Dominant scale: balanced

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Olive / Black, high saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Olive / Black. Its average color saturation is high compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The pattern carries stronger color intensity than most reference patterns.

Light & Dark Structure

Darker than most patterns, typical tonal separation

51.8% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal-group separation is within the broad middle of the reference set.

What you may notice:
The pattern reads dark at a glance.

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure

Edge density is high, average detected edge strength is typical, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Boundary strength is broadly typical of the reference set.

Texture Character

Rougher texture character

Fine texture density is very high, roughness is high, and texture uniformity is typical compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture variation across the pattern is broadly typical of the reference set.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is typical, while average retained-region elongation is low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The effective division of visible regions is broadly typical.

Pattern Scale

Balanced across pattern scales

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as balanced. Fine-scale energy is high, mid-scale energy is low, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
No single scale band dominates strongly enough to define the pattern by itself.

Spatial Distribution

Typical spatial distribution

Spatial information balance is typical, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are very low, low, and low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The spread of visual activity is broadly typical of the reference set.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with darker or more shadowed overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing subdued olive vegetation. Its balanced scale favors backgrounds containing a mixture of visual detail sizes. Its fine texture aligns with backgrounds containing substantial small surface detail.

Where It May Struggle

Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to very bright or pale backgrounds.

Breakup Character

The pattern contains a relatively dense network of detected edges.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.