Predator Fall Grey camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Predator

Fall Grey
This pattern stands out most for darker than most patterns, very high tonal separation; mixed edge structure; and highly variable texture distribution.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Light & Dark Structure

Darker than most patterns, very high tonal separation
Very low overall brightness and very high dark-area share compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure
Very high edge strength and very high hard-edge share compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Texture Character

Highly variable texture distribution
Very low texture uniformity compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: brown
Secondary: black
Warm 99.6%
Cool 0.4%
Neutral 7.2%
Light & Dark
Dark 61.3%
Mid 30.4%
Light 8.4%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 25.4%
Mid 34.8%
Large 39.8%
Dominant scale: balanced

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Brown / Black, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Brown / Black. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Darker than most patterns, very high tonal separation

61.3% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its dark, mid, and light tonal groups are more distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.

What you may notice:
The pattern reads dark at a glance.

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure

Edge density is typical, average detected edge strength is very high, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is very high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Detected boundaries tend to remain visually pronounced where they occur.

Texture Character

Highly variable texture distribution

Fine texture density is typical, roughness is typical, and texture uniformity is very low compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture activity changes noticeably from one part of the pattern to another.

Shape Character

Less fragmented, more elongated

Effective retained-region fragmentation is low, while average retained-region elongation is high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The visible structure is concentrated into fewer effective regions than in many reference patterns.

Pattern Scale

Balanced across pattern scales

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as balanced. Fine-scale energy is typical, mid-scale energy is typical, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
No single scale band dominates strongly enough to define the pattern by itself.

Spatial Distribution

Typical overall spread, with stronger directional imbalance

Spatial information balance is typical, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are typical, high, and high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The overall spread of visual activity is fairly typical, but its arrangement is less symmetrical across one or more directions.