Muddy Water Nfoakus camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Muddy Water

Nfoakus
This pattern stands out most for typical overall spread, with stronger directional imbalance; brighter than most patterns, typical tonal separation; and mixed edge structure.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Spatial Distribution

Typical overall spread, with stronger directional imbalance
Very high left right and very low top bottom compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Light & Dark Structure

Brighter than most patterns, typical tonal separation
High overall brightness and low dark-area share compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure
High edge density compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: brown
Secondary: olive
Warm 80.8%
Cool 19.2%
Neutral 14%
Light & Dark
Dark 23.6%
Mid 61.5%
Light 14.9%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 25.5%
Mid 31.4%
Large 43.1%
Dominant scale: macro

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Brown / Olive, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Brown / Olive. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Brighter than most patterns, typical tonal separation

23.6% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal-group separation is within the broad middle of the reference set.

What you may notice:
The pattern reads bright at a glance.

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure

Edge density is high, average detected edge strength is typical, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Boundary strength is broadly typical of the reference set.

Texture Character

Typical texture character

Fine texture density is typical, roughness is typical, and texture uniformity is typical compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture variation across the pattern is broadly typical of the reference set.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is low, while average retained-region elongation is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The visible structure is concentrated into fewer effective regions than in many reference patterns.

Pattern Scale

Large-scale dominant

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as macro. Fine-scale energy is typical, mid-scale energy is typical, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Large visual structure makes the strongest contribution to the pattern.

Spatial Distribution

Typical overall spread, with stronger directional imbalance

Spatial information balance is typical, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are very high, very low, and typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The overall spread of visual activity is fairly typical, but its arrangement is less symmetrical across one or more directions.